There are certainly a large amount of websites available that use the word "future" inside their domain name, but are they really futurist type websites? It is recommended often by print publishers and editors that the phrase "future" is a great word to use within titles, because it grabs people's attention. But, when people use the word future and then don't give predictions or future accounts, then are they really deceiving the viewer and web-surfer. I think they are.
Recently, an editor of another of things type website asked me to publish a column, in reviewing the internet site I found it to be underwhelming on the futuristic aspect, and more heavy to the scientific news arena. Indeed, if the magazine is serious about "The Future" then why are the articles about new scientific innovations in today's period or happening today? - asked myself.
www.chatrush.com
raadpleger.nl
https://678-hd.com/
www.naiwaennet.com
It appears like they're serious about scientific discovery that's already happened, not what will take the future. That's just boring, more science news, regurgitation, typical human tactic of re-packaging information. I do believe they can do better, but are holding themselves back, afraid to produce people think, worried that you will get too far from your mainstream, quote "core" group of viewers, which I think they do not even understand.
Obviously, as an entrepreneur, I am aware precisely why they do it this way. It is really because they wish to make money and thus sink to a lowered degree of readership, while still pretending to speak about the continuing future of stuff. When the editor wished to defend such comments, the indication was that the site was mostly about scientific news.
Yes, I realize that the site is mostly a news site and I ask what does which have to do with the continuing future of stuff? Shouldn't the internet site be called NSIN.com or something like that; for New Science Innovation News? If the site is approximately Science News and is an accumulation of everyone else's news, then it is really a copy site of a type that is already getting used and not unique. Thus, the content is therefore the same, so even if the articles are written more clearly and easier to comprehend, which can be nice, still what's the value to a "science news junky" as you can find not many articles on the webpage compared with their competition?
If they called themselves a news site, then you may have "futurist type columnists" anyway, who might project these scientific news items into the future or they may keep consitently the "Future Stuff" motif and promote the futurist columnists.
This will be a lesson to any or all "Futuristic" type websites as an incident study. Invest the the future thinkers to your website and have nothing to exhibit them, they will leave. If you utilize trickery to obtain regular readers there, you are doing a significant disservice to the continuing future of mankind, by promoting present inventions whilst the be all end all. Either way, it is unethical to make use of this tactic on future of things type websites.
No comments:
Post a Comment